Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Scene 7 Hangup
This past weekend I was in the lab working on our film both Saturday and Sunday. I went through what we already had and made some edits based on some tf the feedback we received as well as things I noticed that I wanted to change after watching it in class on Thursday. Not major changes, but just spots where shots held on too long or looked awkward. I then moved on to the next scene. There was a par tin scene 7 that gave me difficulty because the coverage that we have doesn't allow for a clean cut. Jim is at the window looking at the card and rubbing the pole, and then in the next shot he's down the hall putting the pole back. First, cutting from him rubbing the pole to the shot we have of this finger bleeding isn't butting well barbecue of how he was holding the pole. Then, in the shot where his finger is bleeding, it cuts with him at the window. In the next shot, he's already part way down the hall, yet we never see him move to walk down the hall in the previous shot. It's jump butting and it's bothering me. I'm trying to figure out a cutaway we can go to or something but I'm not sure. I'm going to have Chris look at it and maybe I'm missing something, or he'll have another idea. Besides that moment in the scene, it's been going well continuing on. We should have a rough cut of all the video done by next Thursday. Then we can focus on sound and score.
2nd Cut
Chris and I showed out 2nd cut in class on Thursday and got some good feedback from the class again. We had changed the opening scene in the basement to play out as Philip's POV which seemed to work better this time and not cause confusion. We were also told that the pacing was good. I was a bit unsure if it was too slow and dragged out, but the class liked that it was slower because it allowed them to connect with Jim and how he is stuck in the basement with nothing to do.
One aspect they loved about sound was when Philip drags out the bear trap. It makes a shrilling sound with the metal on concrete and it's great. Going off aspect of sound scape, we have a lot to do with the sound, and I like Andre's suggestion in playing with the sound to help form the story in Jim's perspective so that Philip's dialogue is muffled at times when Jim in in shock and isn't really listening. I think this will be a great way to help draw the audience into the film. It'll also allow them to connect with Jim more. Also, the idea of blending the ambient sound into the score that we choose was a good idea. It'll help create an unsettling ambiguity that'll keep the audience attentive in trying to figure out what's going on. There were a lot of great suggestions for the sound scape and score that i look forward to experimenting with.
One aspect they loved about sound was when Philip drags out the bear trap. It makes a shrilling sound with the metal on concrete and it's great. Going off aspect of sound scape, we have a lot to do with the sound, and I like Andre's suggestion in playing with the sound to help form the story in Jim's perspective so that Philip's dialogue is muffled at times when Jim in in shock and isn't really listening. I think this will be a great way to help draw the audience into the film. It'll also allow them to connect with Jim more. Also, the idea of blending the ambient sound into the score that we choose was a good idea. It'll help create an unsettling ambiguity that'll keep the audience attentive in trying to figure out what's going on. There were a lot of great suggestions for the sound scape and score that i look forward to experimenting with.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Oh, the Jack of Diamonds
This weekend I went in and looked at the bear trap scene that Chris had worked on. I made a few adjustments in sound and a certain cut that looked strange because the angle was too similar. Then I began working on the next scene where Jim find the metal pole. The challenge of this scene is that, Jim finds the pole because the card falls from the window and he goes to grab it, knocking over the poll. However, once he grabs the pole, he walks back to the window and the card in magically back in the window without us seeing him grab the card and put it back. We may be able to take footage from scene 4 and cut it so that we see some shot of him placing the card (back) in the window, but I'm not sure how well it will work. That will be the challenge of this week. Things have been going rather smoothly so far, though. We've made quite a bit of progress.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Bear Trap challenge
Today I worked on the next scene, which is the bear trap scene, a pivotal moment. We want the audience to be taken back by the face that Phillip comes down and drops this vicious trap in front of Jim. We want this scene to further convey Phillip's mental instability. Going through he footage, I was having difficulties because I wanted some close ups on Phillip. I wanted to punch in tighter on him and get closer to his facial expressions, feeling his off kilter mental state. I also would have liked close ups of the trap, so the audience could see this viscous weapon up close just like Jim was. We do have one that may work, but it depends how the first part of the scene is edited. Also, there was a great shot where we see Phillip putting down the trap int he foreground while Jim is in the background watching him. I like the shot a lot, but it was on the wrong side of the 180 line in comparison to the rest of the footage so we won't be able to use it most likely. This is a tough scene to edit in terms of the coverage we're working with and in trying to craft Dave's performance the best way possible because at some points he sounds very cheesy. It will be a challenge.
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Jump Cuts
Today I worked on recutting the moment that we are introduced to Phillip. A lot of the class thought that the opening track-in shot was Phillip's POV, and that when Jim looks up, he was looking up at Phillip. I recut it accordingly, going straight from the moment when Jim looks up to a POV from Jim's perspective of Phillip standing over him and then kneeling down. It works well and I think this will eliminate the viewers' confusion.
I also worked on recutting the jump cut sequence of Jim eating breakfast. It still needs work, but I'm messing with it to get ideas on the best way to cut it. I also started working on the next scene and looking at all the footage again so I know what I'm working with for scene 4.
I also worked on recutting the jump cut sequence of Jim eating breakfast. It still needs work, but I'm messing with it to get ideas on the best way to cut it. I also started working on the next scene and looking at all the footage again so I know what I'm working with for scene 4.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
4 minute feedback
Today, Chris and I showed the class our 6 minute intro to the film that we have so far. After showing it, we got feedback from the class, a lot of which was helpful and that we are going to incorporate into our edit. The first comment was about the track in during the first scene. A lot of the class thought that it was a POV shot from Phillip's perspective because it is handheld and looks like someone is walking toward Jim. This is a valid point, and I think we are going to re-cut it so that the shot is acting at Phillip's POV. We had talked about this before, and Chris didn't see it as a POV shot. He wanted to see Phillip pop out from the staircase. But, since it is a handheld shot, most audience members are going to expect it to be a POV shot. We don't want to confuse the audience from the start, so we are going to rework the beginning on scene 1 and see if it works better as a POV shot.
Another important comment was about the jump cuts during the scene where Jim eats breakfast. The shots utilize match on action too much and it's confusing whether we are trying to intentionally jump cut, or if the editing is just done poorly. We need to make it more definitive and obvious that we are jump cutting while he eats, which we are doing to instill Jim's urgency to eat. We also may want to use less clips and make each one a little longer.
We are still working on the sound design and incorporating score, but it seemed like the class liked the breathing in the intro. I was unsure if it was too much to be going steady the whole time, but they seemed to think it worked. Faiza suggested increasing the volume as the intro sequence progresses. I want to try that and see how it works.
So far, we've had a good start and got some great feedback. We're going to have a lot of work ahead with sound design, though.
Another important comment was about the jump cuts during the scene where Jim eats breakfast. The shots utilize match on action too much and it's confusing whether we are trying to intentionally jump cut, or if the editing is just done poorly. We need to make it more definitive and obvious that we are jump cutting while he eats, which we are doing to instill Jim's urgency to eat. We also may want to use less clips and make each one a little longer.
We are still working on the sound design and incorporating score, but it seemed like the class liked the breathing in the intro. I was unsure if it was too much to be going steady the whole time, but they seemed to think it worked. Faiza suggested increasing the volume as the intro sequence progresses. I want to try that and see how it works.
So far, we've had a good start and got some great feedback. We're going to have a lot of work ahead with sound design, though.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
The Start
Chris and I have gotten off to a good start with editing The Basement. We had some footage issues at first and had to transcode some of our footage, but now all our footage is transcoded, logged&captured, and ready to go.
Over the past two weeks we have begun editing our film and working on our 4min intro to show the class. First, edited our first scene of the film, in which we are introduced to Jim and Phillip, and we learn of the captive scenario. After editing this, Chris and I thought that it would be a stronger opening sequence to begin with Jim running through the woods. We used quick cuts of handheld shots of Jim running through the woods to create a disorienting, yet intriguing introduction. Our goal here is for the audience to wonder who this boy is and what he's running from, or towards, and why. Then we cut into the main story. Later on, once Jim escapes, we will pick back up in this chase sequence and the audience will understand that the intro was a foreshadowing of what's to come.
One aspect Chris and I have to work a great deal on is score. The music is going to play a large role in this film. We have scouted out a couple of songs that we like, but we're still searching and seeing what score fits where.
Over the past two weeks we have begun editing our film and working on our 4min intro to show the class. First, edited our first scene of the film, in which we are introduced to Jim and Phillip, and we learn of the captive scenario. After editing this, Chris and I thought that it would be a stronger opening sequence to begin with Jim running through the woods. We used quick cuts of handheld shots of Jim running through the woods to create a disorienting, yet intriguing introduction. Our goal here is for the audience to wonder who this boy is and what he's running from, or towards, and why. Then we cut into the main story. Later on, once Jim escapes, we will pick back up in this chase sequence and the audience will understand that the intro was a foreshadowing of what's to come.
One aspect Chris and I have to work a great deal on is score. The music is going to play a large role in this film. We have scouted out a couple of songs that we like, but we're still searching and seeing what score fits where.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)